This
past semester, I listened to The Lord of the Rings in the car during my
commutes to and from campus. Every time I read this book, something different
about it stands out to me. This time, it was the question of which characters
are the most important.
Note:
The following explanation presumes that the reader has read the Lord of the
Rings books, largely because it would take too long for me to summarize
them. If you haven’t read them, GO! READ THEM NOW! The Internet will be here
when you get back. (Not that I have strong feelings about this or anything.) If
you’ve only seen the movies, you’ll probably understand this post, but I’d urge
you to read the books anyway. They’re so much better.
Warning:
This is a very geeky post, but it does have a point. Read at your own risk.
Who is The
Lord of the Rings really about? Nine characters set out on the quest to
destroy the ring, but only two actually make it to Mordor. Frodo is the one
carrying the ring and thus the apparent hero of the story. But Frodo would
never have made it without Sam, who keeps him focused, encourages him and
dramatically rescues him when he gets captured by orcs. Sam is also one of only
two characters in the history of Middle Earth who willingly give up the ring
(the other being Bilbo). Go Sam! But if Frodo hadn’t gone on the quest, Sam
wouldn’t have been there either, and even if he was, Gollum would have killed
him during the first encounter. So both Frodo and Sam need to be present. But
they don’t actually succeed in their mission. Gollum does, of all people. So
maybe he’s the hero.
But the
whole Frodo-Sam plotline only takes up half of the last two books, if that.
Frodo and Sam would never have made it to Mount Doom if Aragorn hadn’t marched
out to attack Mordor, drawing away all the orcs that were patrolling it. No one
else could have pulled that off. It only worked because Sauron was worried
about Aragorn, who was king of Gondor and who Sauron thought had the ring. And Sauron
only thought that because Aragorn had used the palantir, which he wouldn’t have
done if Pippin hadn’t (accidentally) revealed what it was by looking into it. And
the whole let’s-send-our-entire-army-out-as-a-diversion plan was thought of by
Gandalf. So Aragorn, Gandalf, and Pippin are the heroes.
But
Aragorn couldn’t march against Mordor without an army. And if the battle of
Pelennor Fields had been lost, or even gone on much longer, there wouldn’t have
been enough surviving troops for him to go to war. As it was, he barely found
enough soldiers. And the first part of the battle went very, very badly. So
what turned it around? Eowyn’s killing of the Witch King, who was the general
of Sauron’s army and also its most powerful member. He kept Mordor’s troops
organized, along with doing massive damage to Gondor’s army by himself. If he
had not been killed (which, remember, could only be done by a woman), Aragorn
would have had no army and Frodo wouldn’t have made it to Mt. Doom. So Eowyn is
the hero. But the witch king would have killed Eowyn instead if Merry hadn’t
stabbed him at just the right moment. So Merry is the hero.
One
additional point appears at the very end, when the triumphant heroes visit
Isengard. There they learn that Treebeard and the ents had been patrolling the
area around Isengard and had destroyed several bands of orcs that had gone
after the armies of Rohan. If the ents hadn’t been there, the orcs would have
attacked the company that included Eowyn and Merry. The riders of Rohan would
probably have defeated the orcs, but the fighting would have slowed them down. If
it wasn’t for Treebeard, Eowyn, Merry and company would have arrived too late
to win the battle, or if they did make it in time, Gondor’s troops would have
been decimated. Aragorn would not have had an army to march against Mordor, the
orcs would have stayed in place, and Frodo would never have reached Mt. Doom.
Thus, Treebeard is the reason the ring was destroyed, which makes him the real
hero.
Why am
I writing this? Some would say it’s because I’m a geek who thinks too much. And
I would not dispute that. But there’s also an encouraging point in here for
people like me who are idealistic and want our lives to change the world.
Great
things are done, not by isolated individuals, but by groups working for a
common purpose. And the varied strands of individual lives are woven together
in ways we could never predict. The heroes are not just the ones who do
spectacular things and gain the applause and admiration of the crowds. Heroes
are those who do their part, even when they aren’t on the front lines. Our job
is simply to fulfill our callings. The Author of history will see to the rest.
I love LOTR -- and I enjoyed reading your insightful post. Your conclusion brings to mind this scene:
ReplyDelete“I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.
"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us.”
Living out our calling truly is heroic -- in any time.
and, you can be a murderer, and possessed by greed and darkness and be split by your regret, and continually fight and lose to your dark influences, and think only of your obsession at your last moment of life, and yet save the day for the ultimate good. bb
ReplyDeletei am so glad to be validated in my love for treebeard. i always knew he deserved more credit than most people give him.
ReplyDeletesidenote: i love the word "entmoot." i often repeat it to myself in my head. now, how's that for geek?