In my
last post, I looked at some passages relating to the Israelites’ request for a
king and Samuel’s response to it. These passages describe the Israelites’
request as a rejection of God as their king. But I argued that the problem was
not kingship in itself; rather, the problem was that the Israelites expected
the king, instead of God, to save them so that they could continue worshipping
other gods.
Now I’d
like to look at another passage that deals with the establishment of kingship.
But instead of humans establishing it, God does. The passage, 2 Samuel 7,
records God’s response to David after David offers to build the temple. God
gives David some pretty extravagant promises. He says that He will establish
David’s kingdom, that David’s son will build the temple and even that David’s
son would have God as his father. The last point is easy for Christians to
overlook because we’re used to addressing God as “Father,” but in ancient
Israel, having God as their adoptive father gave kings a unique relationship
with and status before God. Now, having a king is more than just OK; now the
kings are tied to God more closely than almost anyone else in Israel (arguably
even more than the priests, who are not called God’s sons).
One
scholar I read summed up the view in this and other passages by saying, “The
king is God.” But that completely oversteps what the text said. In fact, all
these glorious promises come after God has refused to allow David to build the
temple. In other nations, building a temple might be seen as doing the god a
favor, but here the Lord is clear: David can’t do God any favors. In fact, God
is the one doing David a favor by building up his dynasty. (There are some puns
here making this point: both the temple and the dynasty are called a “house.”)
It’s only after tearing down any illusions David may have had about helping God
that God starts to build David up and give him the high status. Kings in Israel
may have had high status, but they were far from divine.
But
even if the king is not seen as divine, they’re still portrayed very
positively, in contrast to the negative picture in 1 Samuel 8 and 12.
There’s
something else to note here. Even before He gets to the promises for David’s
line specifically, God makes some promises for Israel as a whole. Specifically,
He says, “And I will appoint a place for my people Israel and will plant them,
so that they may dwell in their own place and be disturbed no more. And violent
men shall afflict them no more, as formerly, from the time that I appointed
judges over my people Israel. And I will give you rest from all your enemies
Moreover, the Lord declares to you that the Lord will make you a house.” (2
Samuel 7:10-11). Remember that kingship was established just after the period
of the judges, and that as I argued last time, the Israelites were looking to
be freed from foreign oppressors. Now God is offering them the freedom they
crave. The problem was never the Israelites’ desire for peace and liberation;
the problem was their looking for it through human systems and refusing to give
up their idols.
David
and his descendants are not replacements for God; rather their authority is
completely dependent upon God’s. They also, in theory, will not be the kinds of
kings who put up with idolatry. The building of the temple, which God also
promises in this passage, demonstrates the king’s devotion to God and his role
in leading the Israelites in proper worship of the one true God. Thus, they are
the opposite of the type of king criticized in 1 Samuel.
David’s
prayer in the second half of 2 Samuel 8 shows that he agrees with God’s
assessment. He gives thanks and recognizes that God put him in his current
position (v.18). He also affirms that there is only one true God: “Therefore
you are great, O Lord God. For there is none like you, and there is no God
besides you, according to all that we have heard with our ears” (v. 22).
Of
course, David’s descendants didn’t always keep this in mind. Some were proud
and thought of themselves as above God’s law (See Uzziah’s actions in 2Chronicles 26:16-21). Others committed idolatry and led the Israelites to do the
same. These promises found fulfillment to a limited extent during Israel’s
history, but we are still awaiting their truest fulfilment when David’s
greatest descendant, Jesus, returns to rule and bring perfect peace.
For
now, let us note that the positions taken in these two passages in Samuel are
not contradictory, despite the way they might appear in a superficial reading.
They are coming at the same truth from two sides: A good king must be dependent
upon God’s power and must seek to glorify the true God, not replace Him.
No comments:
Post a Comment